Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s overall score of 73.4. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014). These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing the user a lot of extra features.
The Moto X (2014) features a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Moto X (2014) one, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (although slower).
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a lesser megapixels back camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.