Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gold | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Although the Google Pixel 5 is just a bit heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's much thinner and incredibly newer. The Moto X (2014) has a better display than Google Pixel 5, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit worse screen pixels density and a bit smaller screen.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and more RAM. Google Pixel 5 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 5 features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 77% more battery size. Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
The Google Pixel 5 is way more expensive than Moto X (2014), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.