Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Gold | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than Moto X (2014), having a 92.1 score against 73.4. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing you a couple nice extra features. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way heavier than Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and way newer.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better display than Moto X (2014), because it has a much bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels and a little more pixels per screen inch. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a lot better camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way bigger aperture, a way higher resolution camera, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 1 TB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Moto X (2014), and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.