| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Blue, Red and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
LG K52 has an overall score of 76, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 overall score. LG K52 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it is much heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the LG K52 has 10 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit better processor than LG K52, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Moto X (2014) counts with a much better screen than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The LG K52 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
LG K52 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the LG K52 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography, a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.