Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold | Titanium and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K61 is just a bit better than the Moto X (2014), with a 77.6 score against 73.4. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but LG K61 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing the user a lot of extra features. Even though LG K61 is a lot heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer.
The Moto X (2014) features just a little better processing power than LG K61, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. Motorola Moto X (2014) features a better looking screen than LG K61, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG K61 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG K61 has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has a better camera than LG K61, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 13 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.