Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Sky Blue and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K62 is just a bit better than Moto X (2014), having a 78.2 score against 73.4. LG K62's design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it's also incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K62 has a more recent 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
Moto X (2014) counts with a much sharper display than LG K62, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot higher screen density. The Moto X (2014) features just a little better performance than LG K62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
LG K62 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K62 also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG K62 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K62 has a much longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.