Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold | Holographic white |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 has a score of 76.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG Stylo 6 has newer 10 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user lots of additional features. LG Stylo 6's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it's a lot heavier.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better number of pixels per screen inch. Moto X (2014) features a bit more powerful CPU than LG Stylo 6, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto X (2014) features a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low light situations and a tinier camera sensor, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG Stylo 6 features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 74 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG Stylo 6 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.