Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 5.1 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is a bit better than Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. Although LG V10 is extremely heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's thinner and also newer. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V10 has 5.1 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
The LG V10 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a bit better pixels amount per screen inch, a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. Moto X (2014) features a faster CPU than LG V10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a greater number of faster cores.
The LG V10 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video resolution, the LG V10 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, faster 120 fps video frame rate and a better resolution back camera.
LG V10 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V10 counts with improved battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 30% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V10 is also cheaper than the Motorola Moto X (2014), which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.