Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a score of 91.2 against 73.4. These devices work with Android OS, but the LG Wing has newer 10 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, giving some extra features. The LG Wing design is notably newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
The LG Wing has a bit superior processor than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Moto X (2014) features a brighter screen than LG Wing, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen.
LG Wing counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing has a greater camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also has faster video frame rates, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG Wing counts with a superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 74 percent greater battery size.
The LG Wing is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.