Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-09-10 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Gold | Glacier |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. Microsoft Surface Duo's design is a lot newer and noticeably thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it is also incredibly heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Microsoft Surface Duo has the newer 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, offering lots of additional features and performance improvements.
Microsoft Surface Duo has a little faster CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Moto X (2014) has a much better looking screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Moto X (2014) captures clearer videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Microsoft Surface Duo features a much longer battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo, else you can save some money and buy the Moto X (2014), resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.