Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Gold | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is better than the Moto X (2014)'s general score of 73.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, so it counts with a couple additional features and some performance improvements. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 design is a lot newer and much thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also much heavier.
The Moto X (2014) has a bit sharper display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a really longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.