Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s general score of 73.4. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably heavier than Moto X (2014), it's thinner and way newer. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better display than Moto X (2014), because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger display. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rates, a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.