Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus (2021) is slightly better than Moto X (2014), with a 79.3 score against 73.4. Although the Moto G Stylus (2021) is incredibly heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's thinner and also incredibly newer. Moto X (2014) counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Moto X (2014) features a more vivid display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Moto G Stylus (2021) has a better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much larger aperture to take better low-light captures.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.