Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Moto X (2014), getting an 87 score against 73.4. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is much newer and thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it's heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, counting with a couple additional features and better performance.
Moto X (2014) features a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density and a slightly better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior processor than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (although slower).
Motorola razr (2020) features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 224 GB more internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a much bigger aperture.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 22% more battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto X (2014), giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.