Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 15 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Moto X (2014), having a overall score of 79.2 against 73.4. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is newer and notably thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it's way heavier. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
Motorola Moto X (2014) features a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller screen. The Moto X (2014) has a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture and a much better 50 megapixels resolution back camera. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.