Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Glass and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 7.3 is just a bit better than the Moto X (2014), getting a general score of 76.9 against 73.4. Nokia 7.3's design is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Moto X (2014). Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 7.3 has the newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides some nice extra features and better performance.
The Moto X (2014) features a bit more powerful CPU than Nokia 7.3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The Moto X (2014) features a better looking display than Nokia 7.3, because although it has a really smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Nokia 7.3 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory capacity. Nokia 7.3 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia 7.3 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Nokia 7.3 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.