Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Gold | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing you some nice extra features. Although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is notably heavier than Moto X (2014), it's thinner and also way newer.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has just a little better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Moto X (2014) counts with a more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a greater camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a way better resolution back camera, faster video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much better memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto X (2014). If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto X (2014), letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.