Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Gold | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia XR20 has the newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Nokia XR20 body is extremely newer than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it is a little thicker and heavier.
Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels number in each display inch. Moto X (2014) counts with a bit faster CPU than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Nokia XR20 shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has faster video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
The Nokia XR20 features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 features a very superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 101 percent bigger battery capacity.
Nokia XR20 costs a lot more money than Moto X (2014), but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.