Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014), getting a 75.8 score against 73.4. The nubia Red Magic 3S is a extremely newer and a little thinner cellphone than Moto X (2014), although it's extremely heavier. These phones use Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and better performance.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has a better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor, a camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger aperture for better low light images. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 117 percent larger battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra features, you can buy nubia Red Magic 3S, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X (2014), letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.