Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than the Moto X (2014), getting a general score of 76.2 against 73.4. The nubia Red Magic 5S body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but also extremely heavier than Moto X (2014). Both of these phones come with Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing you a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM and more processing cores. Moto X (2014) features a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a larger camera aperture, a much larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 96% greater battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto X (2014). If you prefer to save some money, you can get Moto X (2014), letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.