Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is just a bit better than Moto X (2014), getting a 77 score against 73.4. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's construction is thinner but heavier than the Moto X (2014).
The Moto X (2014) features just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto X (2014) has a much longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.