Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is slightly better than the Moto X (2014), having a general score of 77.4 against 73.4. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a more recent 14 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, so it gives a couple additional features and increased performance. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it's also a lot heavier.
The Moto X (2014) has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Galaxy A15 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A15 5G has a really longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh.
Galaxy A15 5G is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.