Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-06-29 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A21 is slightly better than Moto X (2014), having a overall score of 76.1 against 73.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A21 has newer 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. Galaxy A21's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Moto X (2014).
Motorola Moto X (2014) features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Moto X (2014) features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A21, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images or videos in low light situations and a less mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have a 0.33 inches back camera sensor, the Motorola Moto X (2014) also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A21 features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A21 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A21 features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 74 percent larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A21 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.