Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is slightly better than Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a overall score of 76.1 against 73.4. Galaxy A22 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto X (2014), although it is also a lot heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A22 has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing the user some extra features and performance optimizations.
Moto X (2014) counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels quantity per inch of screen and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A22, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Galaxy A22 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.