Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gold | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is better than Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 overall score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has 11 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it's also way heavier.
Moto X (2014) counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.