Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Moto X (2014), with a 79.9 score against 73.4. The Galaxy A25 5G is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Moto X (2014), but it is a lot heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a little bit better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 117 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.