Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is much better than the Moto X (2014), with an 81.3 score against 73.4. Galaxy A31's construction is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Moto X (2014). These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A31 has the newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, giving you some additional features and performance enhancements.
Moto X (2014) has a brighter display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density. The Moto X (2014) features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 takes better pictures and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Galaxy A31 features a much longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.