Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2022-04-22 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A33 5G has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s overall score of 73.4. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A33 5G has a newer 12 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. Galaxy A33 5G's construction is incredibly newer and thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, but it's also much heavier.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. Moto X (2014) has a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and a camera with lot less mega pixels. Galaxy A33 5G counts with much more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A33 5G has a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 117 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.