Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a overall score of 82.9 against 73.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A34 has newer 13 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, giving you some nice extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy A34's design is much lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
Moto X (2014) features a sharper screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better display density. The Galaxy A34 features a bit better processor than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because it has a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos. The Galaxy A34 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 117% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.