Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Moto X (2014), with a global score of 83.8 against 73.4. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a lot newer and noticeably thinner phone than the Moto X (2014), although it's heavier. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Moto X (2014) features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel number in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a way higher 25 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger aperture and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.