Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the Moto X (2014), having a overall score of 86.6 against 73.4. Galaxy A50s's construction is much newer and a lot thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it is also somewhat heavier. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has a newer 10 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance improvements.
Galaxy A50s features a processing unit that's very similar to Moto X (2014)'s CPU, because although the Galaxy A50s has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM. The Moto X (2014) has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a much larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much more MP camera.
Galaxy A50s features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.