Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), having a global score of 90.8 against 73.4. Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's also much heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing some additional features.
Motorola Moto X (2014) features a brighter display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
Moto X (2014) features a bit better performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster) and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Galaxy A51 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a larger aperture and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little more expensive than the Moto X (2014), but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.