Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer and thinner phone than Moto X (2014), but it is also way heavier.
The Moto X (2014) features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot more MP camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.