Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Moto X (2014), getting a global score of 76.9 against 73.4. The Galaxy A70 construction is incredibly newer and much thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, but it is incredibly heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A70 has 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
The Moto X (2014) features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Moto X (2014) has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel quantity in each display inch.
Moto X (2014) features a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller sensor and a lot tinier camera aperture, they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 features a way better battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.