Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s overall score of 73.4. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, providing a couple nice extra features and better performance. Galaxy A71's design is much newer and way thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, but it is somewhat heavier.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A71, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Moto X (2014) has a much better looking display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A71 takes greater photos and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations and a much larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 is more expensive than the Moto X (2014), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.