Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Moto X (2014), having a 92.9 score against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer and thinner device than the Moto X (2014), although it's also notably heavier. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a newer 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better processing power than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution, a larger aperture and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.