Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-09-04 | -- |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Gold | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | -- |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has an overall score of 80.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a extremely heavier but notably thinner phone than Motorola Moto X (2014). Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides some additional features and some performance improvements.
The Moto X (2014) features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Moto X (2014) has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density.
The Galaxy A73 5G captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a way more MP camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has a superior storage to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A73 5G has a really longer battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.