Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-09-04 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014), having a 77.7 score against 73.4. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy C7 has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0. Samsung Galaxy C7's construction is newer and noticeably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Moto X (2014).
The Moto X (2014) counts with a much better display than Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a quite better display pixel density. The Moto X (2014) has just a little better processing power than Galaxy C7, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
Moto X (2014) counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back facing camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy C7 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Galaxy C7 features a superior battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.