Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold | Blue and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 Pro is slightly better than the Moto X (2014), having a global score of 78.4 against 73.4. Galaxy C7 Pro's construction is a lot newer and extremely thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, but it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy C7 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a sharper display than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Motorola Moto X (2014) also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB.
Moto X (2014) has a bit better performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Moto X (2014) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.