Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Gold | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is much better than Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, so it provides a couple additional features. Galaxy F23 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto X (2014).
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a better looking display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. Moto X (2014) has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F23, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and 4 less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Motorola Moto X (2014) features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and a much worse 13 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy F23 has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy F23 has a really longer battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.