| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), having a score of 88.1 against 73.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some extra features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it is a lot heavier.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Moto X (2014) also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a much better 64 MP resolution back camera, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.