Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), having a score of 97.6 against 73.4. Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly newer and much thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014). These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Moto X (2014) has a brighter screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
The Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera in the back with less MP and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a larger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 90% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto X (2014). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X (2014), giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.