Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2022-07-01 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M13 is better than the Moto X (2014), getting a general score of 81.1 against 73.4. Galaxy M13 is a way newer and thinner cellphone than the Moto X (2014), but it's a lot heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy M13 has a more recent 12 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, so it offers some extra features.
Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M13, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the display. Galaxy M13 has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M13 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto X (2014) takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M13, although it has a way lower 13 mega pixels resolution back camera and a tinier camera aperture.
Galaxy M13 has a much better battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.