Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has newer 10 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some additional features and a performance increase. The Galaxy M51 body is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014).
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Moto X (2014) has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy M51 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 204 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy M51 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.