Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. Galaxy Note 20's design is notably newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, although it's noticeably heavier. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto X (2014) features a brighter display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 2300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.