Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014), getting a global score of 98.9 against 73.4. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X (2014), although it's also a lot heavier.
Moto X (2014) has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a way smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 96 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a camera in the back with much more MP, a much higher video definition, a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.