Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than Motorola Moto X (2014), having an 81.1 score against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it is somewhat heavier and was released about a year before. These phones work with the same Android 5.0 OS. Moto X (2014) features just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note 3, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores and a 450 megahertz graphics processor.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the Motorola Moto X (2014) also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 64 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better camera than Moto X (2014). Both of them have a 0.33 inches back camera sensor, a same size aperture, the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a really longer battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit more expensive than the Moto X (2014), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.