Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Moto X (2014), with an 81.2 score against 73.4. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 5.0 OS. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an older and heavier phone than the Moto X (2014), but Samsung made it somewhat thinner anyway. Moto X (2014) has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
Moto X (2014) counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note 3, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 4 cores and a 450 megahertz graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014). Both of them have the same resolution camera, the same sensor size, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy Note 3 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 64 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.