Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 5.1 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014), with a 79.3 score against 73.4. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has newer 5.1 version while Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy Note 5 body is newer and incredibly thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier.
Moto X (2014) has a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a quite larger screen, a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite higher screen density.
The Galaxy Note 5 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a bigger aperture, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and a camera in the back with more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has improved battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 costs more money than Moto X (2014), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.