Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X (2014), getting an 80.4 score against 73.4. Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014), it's incredibly thinner and a lot newer. The Motorola Moto X (2014) has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080.
Moto X (2014) has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has less RAM and lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a lot larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto X (2014). If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto X (2014), and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.